Madonna more than dropped trou in front of a camera when she was 18 years old … she went au naturel, and TMZ has the photos that are about to hit the auction block. Gotta Have Rock and Roll – the same guys that had Tupac’s confession…
If you’re familiar with singer Sia’s craeer and public persona, then you’re probably aware that the 41-year-old Aussie doesn’t exactly court the spotlight.
Quite the reverse, in fact, as she routinely conceals her face with outlandish wigs or paper bags when appearing in public.
But while Sia may prefer to remain hidden and keep the focus on her music, she proved today that she’s willing to bare all in order to thwart criminals who seek to profit from invading her privacy.
It seems Sia caught wind of the fact that a secretive group was looking to sell several illicit photos taken by paparazzi while she was in a private residence.
Rather than allow these bastards to cash in on their crimes, she undercut their efforts by posting the images online for free.
“Someone is apparently trying to sell naked photos of me to my fans. Save your money, here it is for free. Everyday is Christmas!” Sia tweeted along with a link to the images.
Obviously, Sia shouldn’t have had to take such drastic actions, but this is certainly a masterclass in turning a negative into a positive!
She even snuck in a plug for her forthcoming holiday album, Everyday Is Christmas.
Sia handled the situation like a boss, but for many, the story is bringing to mind other instances in which public figures saw their privacy invaded by hackers in the most appalling fashion imaginable, the most notable of which may have been the so-called “Fappening” that took place in 2014.
Once again, the issue here is about consent.
Sia has posted nude photos in the past, but she did so of her own volition.
This time, her hand was forced, which makes what happened to her nothing less than a sex crime.
Astonishingly, in 2017 there are grown adults who believe that if a public figure has posted nude photos in the past, they’re now considered fair game, and anyone in possession of additional explicit images can post them with impunity.
This makes about as much sense as arguing that because a woman has had sex before, she can’t be raped.
Sexual assault in Hollywood has been in the news a lot lately, with many brave souls coming forward with shocking stories of abuse.
It’s important to bear in mind that being publicly exposed against one’s will can be a traumatizing experience that takes a lifelong toll on the victim–and the perpetrators of such misdeeds are criminals who must be brought to justice, just the same as Harvey Weinstein and his ilk.
Well, this is one way for Taylor Swift to recapture a few positive headlines.
The singer hasn't exactly enjoyed the sort of new album rollout for her upcoming record as she had likely hoped for a few weeks ago, considering the widespread panning of the first single off "Reputation."
Pretty much no one likes "Look What You Made Me Do."
Even worse, folks have basically already forgotten "Ready For It," the release that came next.
But Swift is now out to make them remember, unveiling a 15-second teaser for that second single's official music video on Monday morning…
… and getting naked for it!
In the following preview, the multi-time Grammy Awards winner struts down a hallway with a hood covering her head.
From there, she then turns into some kind of badass robot, fighting off a group of evil villains.
By this point, she's rocking a nude-colored bodysuit for some reason.
The intense teaser is chock full of lightning, magic and action, while casting its singing subject in a dark, superhero-like light.
Will it help boost Taylor's public profile? Will it put her back in the spotlight for reasons that are separate from her ugly past feuds with stars such as Kim Kardashian?
(Someone who, ironically, gets naked ALL THE TIME.)
“…Ready For It? Official Music Video out Thursday night. #ReadyForItMusicVideo,” Swift captioned the video below on all of her social media accounts.
Swift unveiled “…Ready for It” on September 3, just a few days after premiering “Look What You Made Me Do,” the lead single from her upcoming sixth studio album.
Said album will hit stores on November 10.
Check out the trailer below to see Taylor Swift kind of naked!
It’s incredible, it’s apparently sheer coincidence, but it’s true:
Both Kylie Jenner and Khloe Kardashian are pregnant.
The former is expecting her first child with short-term boyfriend Travis Scott, while the latter has finally realized her dream of becoming a mother via sex with Tristan Thompson.
We didn’t see either pregnancy coming… but we’re very happy for both stars, assuming they both actually wanted to get pregnant and are looking forward to motherhood.
And now we’re very happy for another reason as well:
According to Hollywood Life, Khloe and Kylie are planning to pose nude!
“Khloe and Kylie would like to show the world at the same time their growing bellies and would like to do it in a magazine shoot than would be reminiscent of Demi Moore‘s iconic nude pregnancy pictorial in Vanity Fair,” a source tells the aforementioned website.
This same source adds:
“They would love to be belly to belly and together to show off their bumps in the most beautiful way possible.”
While this idea may seem wacky and even a bit incestual, consider:
Kourtney Kardashian posed naked while pregnant for DuJour Magazine in December of 2014.
And Kim Kardashian has posed naked…well… quite often.
There’s a family tradition here.
“It’s what a woman’s body is made to do, so I hope it’s maybe seen as something that’s artistic,” Kourtney said at the time about her decision to show off her birthday suit while she was expecting baby number-three.
“This was something that initially I did for myself just to capture the moment in my life, but these photos are beautiful and I’m happy to share them,” she added.
“And I like how raw they are.”
Way back in 2008, Khloe bared almost everything for a PETA billboard, while Kylie rarely wears much clothing at all in her many Instagram photos.
So, again, it’s not a huge stretch to imagine they’d be down to make some easy money by taking off their clothes for some national magazine.
But simultaneously? Bare baby bump to bare baby bump? That may be more difficult to believe.
Which is not to say we’d be shocked if it happens because nothing about this family could shock us at this point.
Especially not when it comes to nudity.
Meanwhile, Kim Kardashian and Kanye West are expecting a third child to arrive via surrogate in January.
Sources confirm that Kylie and Khloe are also due around that time, which really is pretty insane.
Just when you think Keeping Up with the Kardashians may be running out of material and losing ratings as a result, right?
We wouldn’t be surprised if E! suddenly renews the show for 12 more seasons at this rate and/or signs up Kylie’s fetus for a spinoff.
Which child are you most looking forward to meeting, that of Kim, Khloe or Kylie?
And what sort of names do you think these famous women will come up with for their sons or daughters? We’re both scared and excited to find out!
If you follow Bella Thorne on Instagram, you know that the woman is suffering from a serious clothing allergy.
We certainly don’t blame her, as she’s crazy hot and her comfort in front of the camera helped her amass an astonishing 16 million followers.
We thought we’d seen just about every inch of Bella (ya know, for research), but her latest pic is revealing even by her standards.
That’s Bella in the new issue of GQ: Mexico.
She posted the pic on Instagram, along with a lengthy caption about body positivity and the importance of overcoming insecurities:
“I specifically asked for no re touching on this photo, and lemme tell you I have insecurities, about pretty much everything. That’s natural & that’s human,” Bella wrote.
“You might look at this photo and think oh shush bella, but just know everytime someone looks in the mirror they simply don’t see what everyone else sees,” she added.
“Know that it’s completely normal to feel insecure and it’s accepted. honestly I wish everyone talked more about their insecurities so more people in the world could know they aren’t alone. That it’s ok.”
She concluded on a triumphant note, with a sternly-worded message to the haters:
“F-ck it I’m here to tell you that’s right I’m not F-CKING PERFECT. IM A HUMAN BEING AND IM REAL. So hip hop your asses over the fence and GET OVER IT.”
Well, Bella doesn’t really strike us as the insecure type, but it’s nice to see such a positive message about … sigh, do we have to do this again?
Does every risqué Instagram photo have to be couched in a message of body positivity now?
At this point, it would be more refreshing if a celebrity just said, “Thought I looked hot here. Enjoy!”
Don’t get us wrong – it’s important that young people get the message that everyone has flaws, and the more they’re able to accept their imperfections, the happier they’ll be.
That said, Bella posting a photo like this along with a lengthy message about self-acceptance is like Tom Brady delivering a stirring speech about how it’s okay to feel insecure about your ability to throw 60-yard touchdown in the clutch.
Easy for you to say, Tom! [weeps gently, throws tissue at wastebasket, misses by 8 feet]
Again, we think Bella had the best of intentions here, but posting a smoking hot photo of yourself and then patting yourself on the back for your bravery in doing so is some next-level narcissism.
This post should be in the Millennial Dictionary next to the word “humblebrag.”
But hey, at the end of the day, we’re just happy Bella’s not banging Scott Disick anymore.
Now, that’s something to take pride in!
Kim Kardashian has just done something she’s never done before.
Pose naked? Please.
Kim Kardashian has done that an average of, like, six times per year of the past decade.
But pose naked in a tree?
Yes, even for Kim Kardashian, this is a first.
The mother of two young kids shared the risque photo below on both her Facebook page and her Instagram account on Tuesday evening.
“So honored to have been photographed by Mert and Marcus for their book new book! 20 years in the making! It’s out on Sept 7th in NYC,” she wrote as a caption in both places.
(Mert and Marcus is the working name of two fashion photographers, Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott, who often work together on a collaborative basis.)
On Facebook, at the time of this writing, the image had received 982 Comments, while it had been liked over 623,000 times in just over an hour.
Yup: folks sure do love it when Kim Kardashian takes off her clothing!
This was first proven true, of course, when the Kim Kardashian sex tape was released and millions of people shelled out money to see her receive an erection from Ray J in her most private of places.
Since then, Kardashian has gone naked for Playboy… and Paper Magazine… and Harper’s Bazaar… and nearly revealed her entire birthday suit on a handful of random Tuesdays on Instagram.
A month ago, there had been talk that Kardashian was on a crash diet in order to once again strip down in full public view.
“Kim’s obsessed with dropping a ton more weight and won’t consume more than 700 calories in a day,” an insider told Radar Online at the time, adding:
“She’s punishing herself with intense workouts. She’s pinned up the photos of her chubby butt from earlier this year as inspiration.”
As is often the case, reaction to this sort of Kim Kardashian NSFW image has been mixed:
Some people can’t believe how great she still looks.
Other people can’t believe an adult mother of two, who is already rich and famous, would continue to get so naked.
Where do you come down? Is this just a woman rightfully proud of her body and showing it off to remain relevant?
Or is this someone desperate for attention who continues to set the women’s movement back generations?
Ponder. Decide. Debate.
And then compare this Kim Kardashian nude picture to the great many others from her past below:
Teen Mom 2 stars Brooke Wehr and Jeremy Calvert, also known as the ex-husband of Leah Messer, are officially back together.
If you weren’t convinced of the truth of this rumor before, she’s cleared it up for you now … with a nice photo of Jeremy Calvert nude.
Wehr posted a photo of Calvert’s naked back in bed, not so subtly confirming earlier reports that they have rekindled their relationship.
She captioned it, “Sleepy head #vegas #naptime #lazyass.”
What happens in Las Vegas doesn’t stay there, evidently.
In addition to making her point that Brooke Wehr and Jeremy Calvert are back together, she also revealed a celebrity run-in.
The Teen Mom 2 tandem ran into another reality star duo, Vanderpump Rules’ Jax Taylor and Tom Schwartz, while in Vegas.
“@mrjaxtaylor and @twschwa are the best” she wrote, apparently never having watched Vanderpump Rules and seen Jax in action.
“Glad I got to meet you guys.”
Fortunately, she did not post any photos of Jax nude, though you have to imagine someone else will by the end of the weekend.
In any case, Brooke Wehr has been virtually MIA from Teen Mom 2 this season as her romance with Calvert imploded early on.
She was engaged to Calvert as of earlier this year, and has famously come between Jeremy and his reality star ex-wife, Leah.
That’s not to imply that Jeremy cheated on Brooke with Leah, a popular rumor that circulated around the Internet. Not the case.
However, his physical absence from West Virginia – Brooke lives in Ohio with her own daughter – has caused issues with Leah.
That’s very reasonable, as Messer felt quasi-abandoned and like a single mother of the couple’s daughter, Adalynn, at times.
You may also recall a more recent scene in which Jeremy threw Brooke under the bus as a controlling, borderline abusive monster.
Just kidding, he later said.
While Calvert went OFF on Wehr on Instagram in May and portrayed her as a psycho on the MTV reality show, that’s his bad, he says.
He famously claimed that he “came home to all my s–t being everywhere” one day because Brooke went through his phone and “lost her s–t.”
The alleged reason? That he talked to Leah about their little girl enrolling in preschool, but a jealous Wehr flipped the f–k out on him.
“The episode you saw,” he would later confess, “Brooke came off as crazy, which she isn’t at all. It was all my fault during that time.”
“The reason we broke up wasn’t because of me and Leah talking about Addie’s preschool stuff. It was me talking to a different girl. Period.”
In response to rumors of Leah and Jeremy getting back together, Brooke recently said on Instagram, “He’s not back with Leah.”
“We are back together, have been for a few months now. I just never posted about it until now,” she added, fearing the obvious backlash.
Looks like those fears are in the rear view mirror now, and she’s taking in a different kind of rear view … if you know what we mean.
There’s more to that Jay Cutler butt pic than meets the (brown) eye … so says Kristin Cavallari! Turns out, the famous Jay Butt-ler pic was taken during an outing to a nude beach during a romantic trip to Mexico back in March. Cavallari…
Every time a new round of explicit photos stolen from a celebrity’s private collection goes public, there’s a renewed outcry to tighten security and ramp up enforcement of existing laws.
Unfortunately, most of the time, the perpertators go unpunished, and it’s not long before a new round of celebrity nudes goes public.
The latest victim is Justin Bieber, and in a bizarre twist, Bieber’s ex-girlfriend Selena Gomez was also victimized by the hackers.
According to TMZ, several nude photos of Bieber appeared on Gomez’s Instagram page Monday afternoon.
The site reports that the hackers captioned the photo with lewd comments about Bieber and boasts about their hacking abilities.
“LOOK AT THIS N-GGA LIL SHRIMPY,” they wrote, before encouraging users to follow three Instagram accounts, each of which only has a handful of posts, but several thousand followers.
“We run da scene,” they concluded.
Gomez quickly deactivated her account after the hack.
She is now back on Instagram, and has not yet publicly commented on the incident.
Bieber has also not yet commented on the situation, and it’s possible that both singers will simply refuse to acknowledge the hackers, as they seem to be seeking notoriety.
This is not the first time that Bieber has been hacked, and sadly, it looks as though it may not be the last.
There are those who have argued that like obnoxious paparazzi and over-zealous fans, a lack of digital priivacy is just a reality of life as a celebrity in the 21st century.
The problem with that argument, of course, is that sharing someone’s nude photos without their consent constitutes a sex crime, and a world where famous people are forced to come to accept being victimized by sexual predators, is surely one that none of us wants to live in.
We don’t pretend to have the answer to the growing problem, but we’re certain that a complacent shrug is not the solution.
This time, the photos were removed quickly, but both Justin and Selena have no doubt been left with lingering feelings of vulnerability.
Both celebrities and non-famous folks who have been victims of hacks are accutely aware of a reality that most of us do are best to ignore at 2017:
Each of us is more exposed than ever before, and few among of us have any real sense of what it takes to keep out personal data safe.
Today it’s Justin Bieber, but tomorrow it could be anyone.
Kylie Jenner may not understand the meaning of the word “nude.”
But she most definitely understands how to garner attention for herself, that’s for certain.
The 20-year old has shared several of what may her most seductive images to date, courtesy of a publication that has made a name for itself by featuring various celebrities in the near buff:
Snapped by photographer Nick Knight, Jenner says these photographs represent her “first super nude shoot, adding:
“I always post sexy pictures, but have never really gone nude.”‘
The former statement is very true.
The latter statement remains very true.
Because while there’s very little separating the Life of Kylie star from the open air in these pictures, the fact remains that she is not nude. She’s wearing lingerie.
Very sheer lingerie that is kind of see-through in certain parts.
But lingerie nonetheless.
Look closely at a couple of these images and you can see a protruded nipple, we’ll grant Jenner that much.
Kylie, of course, is merely the latest member of her famous family to pose in almost nothing for V.
Remember these Kim Kardashian V photos?
Or the time Kendall Jenner didn’t wear pants, while showing off a HUGE snake tattoo, also for V?
Not that we’re complaining about Kylie’s spread. Not one bit.
She just, you know, isn’t naked. (Which is probably a good thing, seeing how she’s 20 years old and everything.)
The reality star is currently anchoring her very own E! series, as she continues to try and establish a name for herself outside of her siblings.
She’s done a pretty great job as that with her Instagram account (which often features numerous nearly-nude pics as well), and most significantly with her cosmetics line.
It pains us to write this, but Jenner’s business is worth a crazy amount of money.
And it’s only growing.
Why not just sit back and rake it in via this sort of respectable avenue? Instead of shedding so many layers for a kind of trashy magazine?
You’ll need to ask that question of Kylie.
But this is mostly just how she was raised. It’s what she knows. And it works, as she and her sisters prove on a near daily basis.
Check out some of Kylie’s raciest pictures of all-time below and then respond:
Where do her new V Magazine photos rank?