Britney Spears: PISSED Over New Kevin Federline Child Support Agreement!

Back in February, Kevin Federline demanded more child support from Britney Spears.

He argued that the $ 20,000 he receives each month isn’t enough support for the two preteen sons, of whom he shares custody with Britney.

Well, it looks like he’s gotten his wish.

The Blast reports that Kevin Federline and Britney Spears have reached a new child support agreement.

Apparently Britney will be paying “thousands more a month in child support,” the report reveals.

An inside source tells E! that Britney and her team think that the new agreement is giving Britney’s ex too much.

“They are not happy,” the insider reveals. “And think the settlement is ludicrous.”

“But,” the source explains. “They wanted to make an agreement so that they could move on.”

That makes sense. Any legal battle is tiring, but this is especially true when both sides share children. You want the conflict to end.

Honestly, this is probably the outcome that Federline’s team hoped for, because Britney can afford to cave in order to rid herself of a source of stress.

Despite that, Britney is said to be “very unhappy” with this outcome.

She knows, the insider says, that this is “in her best interest.”

“She was tired of fighting about it,” the source explains. “And is ready to get on with her life and put this behind her.”

Britney may be less than thrilled, but Federline’s attorney Mark Vincent Kaplan is over the moon.

“I am happy that they came around to resolving this matter,” Kaplan tells E!

“I am sure that they decided the money would be better extended on child support than on attorney’s fees,” he says.

“Which,” Kaplan continues. “Would’ve achieved the same result for Kevin but only after months and hundreds of thousands of dollars on litigation.”

Kaplan’s statement concludes: “They made a wise decision.”

Someone close to Federline says that there’s a clear winner, and it isn’t Britney.

“Kevin is getting more money monthly than what he had originally asked for before he ever filed his RFO,” the insider says.

In this source’s opinion: “Britney’s team would’ve been better off settling with Kevin at that time because now he got more than what he initially asked for.”

“There are more attorney fees that Britney agreed to pay that were folded into the settlement,” the insider reasons. “in addition to the $ 100,000 Mark Kaplan was already rewarded.”

We mentioned that Britney was ordered to pay for Federline’s attorney’s fees just last month.

“Kevin is extremely pleased for himself, for the kids and for Britney,” the source describes.

“It was the right thing to do on her part,” the insider opines. “And it allows the kids to get the benefit of the standard of living both parents can provide for them.”

That, at least, is a point with some merit. Sean Preston and Jayden James spend part of the time with their dad and part of the time with their mom.

While $ 20,000 is more than enough to cover all of the basic needs and most of the wants of two preteen boys for a fraction of each month, that doesn’t mean that their lifestyle should plummet when it’s their turn with dad, right?

Still, and call us cynical, but it’s difficult to see this as anything more than a grab for more money because Britney is loaded and Kevins “DJ career” is somehow failing to take the world by storm.


Britney Spears Ordered to Pay Six Figures to Kevin Federline

Earlier this year, Kevin Federline demanded that Britney Spears give him more child support. He claims that as their two sons grow older, $ 20,000 per month is no longer enough.

Now, Britney has been ordered to pay out $ 110,000 to her ex.

And she could be on the hook to pay out much, much more.

Of the ordered payout$ 110,000, $ 100,000 will go to cover Federline’s legal expenses, including services and fees.

$ 10,000 will be given to Benchmark Resolution Group, court documents reveal.

All things considered, since Federline requested that she pay the costs that he was already anticipating — including $ 250,000 in attorney’s fees and $ 100,000 for forensic accounting, this could have been worse.

But this order isn’t a resolution to their ongoing disagreement about child support payments.

“We tried to see if we could voluntarily come to an agreement on what the increased number of child support would be,” Federline’s legal team tells E! 

“And,” the attorney laments. “In the process for doing that, [Britney’s team] came back with several conditions that were not acceptable.”

“As a result,” Federline’s attorney says. “Kevin had to file a formal request that the court determine what the appropriate amount for child support is.”

That’s generally how disputes about child support payments are settled.

“If the court decides that this should be a reasonable needs order,” Federline’s attorney shares. “Then we’re going to use expert testimony to establish what the reasonable needs are of the minor children.”

It should be very interesting to see an itemized list that will explain why two middle school aged boys with no special health issues are so expensive that they cost more than $ 20,000 per month.

“This was an initial contributive payment,” the attorney says of this $ 110,000 payment that the court ordered.

“If Britney and the conservators continue to fight tooth and nail about turning over any financial information,” Federline’s attorney threatens. “This will not be the last fee order they’re ordered to pay me on Kevin’s behalf.”

“It’s puzzling why they’re putting so much energy into fighting the disclosure of her finances,” Team Federline says. “But I’m not deterred.”

It sounds like Federline’s team is going ot look into what Britney spends on her sons, directly and indirectly, and argue that Kevin Federline should get that much.

Federline’s team is confident that they will get what they’re looking for.

“We will get there eventually,” Federline’s attorney says. “It’s just a question of how much they want to cost themselves creating speed bumps on the road to the ultimate destination.”

He sounds very sure of himself. But that’s kind of his job.

“The next few hearings,” he continues. “They will be reporting to a private settlement judge.”

Federline’s attorney concludes: “The private judge will help resolve any discovery issues to see whether or not he can get the parties to agree on some interim findings that would avoid all-out, hand-to-hand litigation combat.”

Obviously, no matter what arguments are made in court, no one should look at Sean Preston or Jayden as somehow demanding more cash. This is a dispute between their parents.

Similarly, it is Federline’s attorney’s sworn duty to try to squeeze every cent out of Britney that he can. He’s just doing his job.

Though many believe that he’s hoping for extra cash to support his multiple other children, Federline’s argument does make some sense.

We’re not sure how the boys getting older somehow costs more than $ 20,000 a month, especially since Federline does not have them all of the time.

But it is true that both Kevin Federline and Britney Spears are in different financial situations than they were about a decade ago, when the child support arrangements were made.

An updated child support arrangement could cost Britney major cash.


Jamie Lynn Spears: Mom-Shamed Over Young Daughter’s Gun Photo!

Just two months ago, Jamie Lynn Spears showed the first photos of her infant daughter, Ivey Joan Watson.

Now, her husband is showing off pics of her eldest daughter, Maddie Aldridge, and the photo is proving to be controversial among fans.

Why? Because Maddie is wielding a shotgun and poised to go hunting at only 10 years old.

Jamie Lynn Spears’ husband, Jamie Watson, shared a photo of the couple’s young daughter, Maddie Aldridge.

Maddie is 10 years old, and famously miraculously recovered from drowning just a year and a half ago.

In the photo, Maddie is standing outdoors and sporting a shotgun with some protective gear over her ears.

“Getting her ready for dove season,” Jamie captioned the photo.

Take a look:

Followers who found the image alarming were quick to blast both Jamies — Jamie Lynn Spears and Jamie Watson — for taking her hunting.

“Jesus no wonder America it’s drowning faster than the titanic,” wrote one commenter in despair.

“Put down the gun, pick up a pair of binoculars, & take a hike together,” suggested one follower. “For me, teaching kids to kill when there is absolutely no need seems very, very wrong.”

“Stupid, stupid,” another wrote succinctly.

Another took aim at a defense of the practice, writing: “Honor the outdoors by killing innocent animals? Disgusting [point of view].”

“A 10 year old with a shotgun,” one commenter lamented. “If that’s not redneck I don’t know what is.”

Maddie’s aunt Britney may be the absolute queen of pop, but she and her sister are from Louisiana. They’ve been called some unflattering things.

“You´re so irresponsible,” another fan wrote. “Guns are not a toy.”

“it’s ironic they post about their amazing dog (who is totally dependent on them) all the time,” someone wrote. “When they then go and kill animals that are living their own lives minding their own business.”

This person seems to be okay with hunting when adults are doing it, but hates the idea of kids wielding deadly weapons, writing: “Teaching kids to kill things is weird leave that till they’re older, man.”

“Bad parents,” another simply wrote.

As with any controversy, there were also defenders.

“Welcome to the South people. If you dont like it, head out!” writes one defender, who does not speak for all Southerners.

“That little girl has more talent and could completely take care of herself and she just turned 10,” that commenter continues.

Finally, that commenter laments: “Ugh I cannot stand judgement from people who know nothing about what they are looking at! Get it Maddie!”

“I have followed you and @jamielynnspears for years and I so respect your admirable life that you live,” another writes.

They continue: “Seeing celebrities allow their children to live normal lives that kids should live and also honor the love of outdoors regardless of disapproval from some people is amazing and gives me hope in future kids!”

That commenter may be missing the point — the people who take issue with this don’t consider gun-toting animal-killing as part of children’s normal lives.

“I pray she stays like that all of her life,” the commenter concludes. “And passes it on to her kids!”

“You are a wonderful father to Maddie,” another defender writes to Jamie Watson. “Teaching her right.”

This person laments that so many children enjoy engaging storytelling and interacting with their peers using electronics instead of hunting.

“So many kids are hung up on video games and their IPads they never see the outdoors,” the defender continues. “So kudos to you!”

It’s interesting, since a (widely debunked) criticism of video games is that they somehow turn children violent, to see someone praising hunting, which involves actual, real-world violence, as an alternative.

Hunting is always going to be controversial — but it’s unclear if Jamie Watson was trying to stir up controversy or was just proud of Maddie’s outdoorsy, athletic spirit.


Britney Spears Explores Berlin with Sons During Kevin Federline Child Support Battle

Britney Spears doesn’t subscribe to the “More Money, More Problems” theory … or so it seems ‘cause she’s having a helluva time with her 2 sons in the midst of a child support battle with Kevin Federline. The singer and her 2 sons — Sean and…